A REPORTER
AT LARGE
THE POVERTY
CLINIC
Can a
stressful childhood make you a sick adult?
BY PAUL
TOUGH
Monisha
Sullivan first visited the Bayview Child Health Center a few days
before
Christmas, in 2008. Sixteen years old, she was an African-American
teen-age
mother who had grown up in the poorest and most violent neighborhood in
San
Francisco, Bayview-Hunters Point, a bleak collage of warehouses and
one-story
public housing projects in the city's southeastern corner. Sullivan
arrived at
the clinic with ailments that the staff routinely observed in patients:
strep
throat, asthma, scabies, and a weight problem. The clinic's medical
director,
Nadine Burke, examined Sullivan and prescribed the usual
remedies-penicillin
for her strep throat, ProAir for her asthma, and permethrin for her
scabies-and
at most clinics that would have been the end of the visit. But Burke,
who
founded the center in 2007, was having a crisis of confidence regarding
her
practice, and Sullivan was the kind of patient who made her feel
particularly
uneasy. Burke was diligently ticking off each box on the inner-city
pediatrician's checklist, but Sullivan's problems appeared to transcend
mere
physical symptoms. She was depressed and listless, staring at the floor
of the
examination room and responding to Burke's questions in sullen
monosyllables.
She hated school, didn't like her foster mother, and seemed not to care
one way
or the other about her two month-old daughter, Sarai.
Burke is
charismatic and friendly, and her palpable concern for her patients
disarms
even the toughest cases. It helps that she is dark-skinned, like most
of her
patients, and young-just thirty-five. But her childhood was very
different from
theirs. The daughter of Jamaican professionals who moved from Kingston
to
Silicon Valley when Burke was four, she attended public school in Palo
Alto,
where the kids were mostly white and well-off, and where girls cried in
the
cafeteria if they didn't get the right car for their sixteenth
birthday. Like
many children of immigrants, Burke has learned to move fluidly between
cultures. She now lives in a house in an upscale part of Potrero Hill,
a San
Francisco neighborhood, with a closet full of designer clothes, and she
has a
fiancé who is a wealthy solar-energy entrepreneur. But she seems just
as
comfortable among the mostly poor families she sees in her examination
room:
laughing, gossiping, hugging, and scolding, in Spanish as well as in
English,
in a full-throated alto that echoes down the hall.
At the
clinic, Burke gently interrogated Sullivan until she opened up about
her
childhood: her mother was a cocaine addict who had abandoned her in the
hospital only a few days after she was born, prematurely, weighing just
three
and a half pounds. As a child, Sullivan lived with her father and her
older
brother in a section of Hunters Point that is notorious for its gang
violence;
her father, too, began taking drugs, and at the age of ten she and her
brother
were removed from their home, separated, and placed in foster care.
Since then,
she had been in nine placements, staying with a family or in a group
home
until, inevitably, fights erupted over food or homework or TV and
Sullivan ran
away-or her caregivers gave up. She longed to be with her father,
despite his
shortcomings, but there was always some reason that he couldn't take
her back.
For a long time, she had the same dream at night: taking the No. 44 bus
back to
Hunters Point, walking into her father's house, and returning to her
old
bedroom, everything just as it used to be. Then she'd wake up and
realize that
none of it was true.
When I met
Sullivan, last September, she had recently turned eighteen, and three
days
earlier she had been emancipated from foster care. She was now living
alone, in
a subsidized apartment off Fillmore Street. In California, emancipated
foster children
are given a summary of their case file, which meant that Sullivan had
just been
handed an official history of her rootless adolescence. "It brought up
a
lot of emotions," she told me. "I read it, and I kind of wanted to
cry. But I was just, like, 'It's over with.' “ The most painful memory
was of
the day, in fifth grade, when she was pulled out of class by a social
worker
she had never met and driven to a strange new home. It was months
before she
was able to have contact with her father. "I still have dreams about
it," she told me. "I feel like I'm going to be damaged forever."
I asked
Sullivan to explain what that damage felt like. For a teen-ager,
Sullivan is
unusually articulate about her emotional state- when she feels sad or
depressed, she writes poems-and she evoked her symptoms with precision.
She had
insomnia and nightmares, she said, and at times her body inexplicably
ached.
Her hands sometimes shook uncontrollably. Her hair had recently started
falling
out, and she was wearing a pale-green head scarf to cover up a thin
patch. More
than anything, she felt anxious: about school, her daughter, even
earthquakes.
"I think about the weirdest things," she said. "I think about
the world ending. If a plane flies over me, I think they're going to
drop a
bomb. I think about my dad dying. If I lose him, I don't know what I'm
going to
do." She was even anxious about her anxiety. 'When I get scared, I
start
shaking," she said. "My heart starts beating. I start sweating. You
know how people say, 'I was scared to death'? I get scared that that's
really
going to happen to me one day."
Sullivan
encountered Nadine Burke at a moment when Burke was just beginning to
think
deeply about the physical effects of anxiety. She was immersing herself
in the
rapidly evolving sciences of stress physiology and neuro-endocrinology,
staying
up late reading journals like Molecular Psychiatry and Nature
Neuroscience.
Burke had just learned of a pioneering study, conducted in San Diego,
on the
long-term health effects of childhood trauma, and its conclusions had
led her
toward a new way of thinking-not just about her clinical practice but
about the
entire field of pediatric medicine.
As she
listened to Sullivan, Burke found herself inching toward a diagnosis
that, a
year earlier, would have struck her as implausible. What if Sullivan's
anxiety
asn't merely an emotional side effect of her difficult life but the
central
issue affecting her health? According to the research Burke had been
reading,
the traumatic events that Sullivan experienced in childhood had likely
caused
significant and long-lasting chemical changes in both her brain and her
body,
and these changes could well be making her sick, and also increasing
her
chances of serious medical problems in adulthood. And Sullivan's case
wasn't
unusual; Burke was seeing the same patterns of trauma, stress, and
symptoms
every day in many of her patients.
Two years
after Sullivan's first visit, Burke has transformed her practice. Her
methodology remains rooted in science, but it goes beyond the typical
boundaries of medicine. Burke believes that regarding childhood trauma
as a
medical issue helps her to treat more effectively the symptoms of
patients like
Sullivan.
Moreover,
she believes, this approach, when applied to a large population, might
help
alleviate the broader dysfunction that plagues poor neighborhoods. In
the view
of Burke and the researchers she has been following, many of the
problems that
we think of as social issues-and therefore the province of economists
and sociologists-might
better be addressed on the molecular level, among neurons and cytokines
and
interleukins. If these researchers are right, it could be time to
reassess the
relationship between poverty, child development, and health, and the
Bayview
clinic may turn out to be a place where a new kind of pediatric
medicine is
taking its tentative first steps.
"With
someone like Monisha, we can help her recognize the neurochemical
dysregulation
that her childhood has produced in her," Burke told me. "That will
reduce her impulsivity; it will allow her to respond more calmly to
provocation, it will help her make better choices. She'll have a better
life."
In 2005,
when Burke completed her medical residency, at a children's hospital on
the
campus of Stanford University, she was an idealistic twenty-year-old
with a
medical degree from the University of California at Davis and a
master's in
public health from Harvard. She was recruited by the California Pacific
Medical
Center, a private hospital group, to take on a vaguely defined but
noble-sounding job: identifying and addressing health disparities in
San
Francisco, where the poverty rate for black families is five times as
high as
that for white families. Much of the city's African-American population
lives in
Bayview-Hunters Point, a largely industrial area that has a
sewage-treatment
facility and a sprawling Superfund site. Rates of congestive heart
failure are
nearly five times as high in Bayview-Hunters Point as in the Marina
district, a
few miles away. Before Burke's clinic opened, there was only one
pediatrician
in private practice in a community with more than ten thousand
children.
At Harvard,
Burke had studied health disparities, and she knew what the
public-health
playbook recommended: improving access to health care, especially
primary care,
for low-income families. She persuaded her new bosses at California
Pacific to
let her open a clinic in Bayview-Hunters Point that would accept all
patients,
regardless of their ability to pay. She found some empty office space
on Evans
Avenue, across from a giant mail-sorting facility, and had the place
remodeled
and repainted in bright colors.
When the
clinic opened, in 2007, Burke focused on health issues that
particularly
plagued poor children: asthma, obesity, vaccination rates. In just a
few
months, she made significant headway. "It turned out to be surprisingly
easy to get our immunization rates way up and to get our asthma
hospitalization
rates way down," she told me. And yet, she explained, "I felt like we
weren't actually addressing the roots of the disparity. I mean, as far
as I
know, no child in this community has died of tetanus in a very, very
long
time."
Burke found
herself thinking increasingly about the problems that she couldn't
immunize her
patients against: homelessness, gang violence, physical abuse, and
sexual
abuse, as well as absent fathers, fathers beating mothers, brothers
shot to
death on the street, uncles sent to prison. These problems were,
technically,
none of her business. If you want to tackle violence and abuse and
deprivation
in the inner city, you don't go to public-health school; you become a
social
worker or a judge or a cop. What did the field of medicine really have
to offer
kids like Monisha Sullivan, besides a little ProAir and permethrin?
Then, one
day in the fall of 2008, Whitney Clarke, a psychologist who had
recently joined
the clinic's staff, handed Burke a six-year-old medical article that he
had
read online. Titled "The Relationship of Adverse Childhood Experiences
to
Adult Health: Turning Gold Into
Lead," its author was Vincent J. F Felitti, the head of the department
of
preventive medicine at Kaiser Permanente, the health-management
organization
based in California. The article described the Adverse Childhood
Experience
study, commonly called the ACE study, which assessed the health
outcomes of
patients enrolled in the Kaiser HM.O. between 1994 and 1998. Felitti
had
conducted the study with Robert F. Anda, an epidemiologist at the
Centers for
Disease Control, in Atlanta. The study indicated to Burke that the
traumatic
experiences her patients faced every day were producing not just
emotional
difficulties but also serious medical consequences, both present and
future.
Burke told me that when she finished reading about the ACE study she
"could hear the angels singing. The clouds parted." She laughed.
"It was like that scene at the end of 'The Matrix' where Neo can see
the
whole universe bending and changing." Maybe social problems were her
business after all.
The ACE study
was an ambitious undertaking. Beginning in 1995, Kaiser H.M.O. members
in the
San Diego area who came in for a comprehensive medical exam were later
sent a
questionnaire asking them to describe their personal history in various
categories-first eight, then ten-of "adverse childhood experiences,"
including parental divorce, physical abuse, emotional neglect, and
sexual
abuse, as well as growing up with family members who suffered from
mental
illness, alcoholism, or drug problems. In the course of a few years,
more than
seventeen thousand patients completed and returned the questionnaire-a
response
rate of nearly seventy per cent. As a group, the respondents
represented a
mainstream, middleclass demographic: sixty-nine per cent were
Caucasian;
seventy-four per cent had attended college; their average age was
fifty-seven.
Anda and
Felitti found a number of unexpected results. The first was the
prevalence of
adverse experiences among this generally well-off population. More than
a
quarter of the patients said they had grown up in a household in which
there
was an alcoholic or a drug user; about the same fraction had been
beaten as
children. The doctors used the data to assign patients an "ACE
score," giving them one point for each category of trauma they had
experienced.
Two thirds of the patients had experienced at least one category; one
in six
had an ACE score of 4 or higher. The second, and more significant,
surprise
came when Anda and Felitti compared the ACE scores with the voluminous
medical
histories that Kaiser had collected on each patient. The correlations
between
adverse childhood experiences and negative adult outcomes were so
powerful that
they "stunned us," Anda later wrote. And those correlations seemed to
follow a surprisingly linear "dose-response" model: the higher the
ACE score, the worse the outcome, on almost every measure, from
addictive
behavior to chronic disease. Compared with people who had no history of
ACEs,
those with ACE scores of 4 or higher were twice as likely to smoke,
seven times
as likely to be alcoholics, and six times as likely to have had sex
before the
age of fifteen. They were twice as likely to have been diagnosed with
cancer,
twice as likely to have heart disease, and four times as likely to
suffer from
emphysema or chronic bronchitis. Adults with an ACE score of 4 or
higher were
twelve times as likely to have attempted suicide than those with an ACE
score
of O. And men with an ACE score of 6 or higher were forty-six times as
likely
to have injected drugs than men who had no history of ACEs.
Some of the
results made intuitive sense. Sigmund Freud had argued that traumatic
events in
childhood could produce negative feelings in adulthood, and it was
reasonable
to assume that those feelings could lead to addiction, depression, and
even
suicide. But what about cancer and heart disease? Felitti and Anda
started with
the assumption that ACEs led to chronic illness through behaviors like
smoking,
heavy drinking, and overeating, which would produce increased rates of
lung
cancer, liver disease, diabetes, and heart disease. The problem with
this
theory was that ACEs had a profound negative effect on adult health
even when
those behaviors weren't evident. The researchers looked at patients
with ACE
scores of 7 or higher who didn't smoke, didn't drink to excess, and
weren't
overweight, and found that their risk of ischemic heart disease (the
most
common cause of death in the United States) was three hundred and sixty
per
cent higher than it was for patients with a score of o. Somehow, the
traumatic
experiences of their childhoods were having a deleterious effect on
their later
health, through a pathway that had nothing to do with bad behavior. But
Felitti
and Anda couldn't figure out what it was.
The medical
field has not, on the whole, been quick to embrace Anda and Felitti's
findings.
The main critique of the ACE study is that it is retrospective, meaning
that it
relies on the memory and the credibility of the original respondents.
Maybe
some patients misremembered or even invented their traumatic
experiences;
perhaps the respondents with the most wayward adult lives were the most
eager
to blame external forces, even imaginary ones, for their poor health.
(Why do I
smoke and overeat? Because my parents didn't love me.) Anda and Felitti
have
responded to this criticism in subsequent papers, saying that
underreporting of
trauma is more likely than over reporting; even in this confessional
age,
people are often uncomfortable acknowledging childhood sexual abuse or
an
alcoholic parent. In the end, though, Anda and Felitti have no way of
knowing
for certain how honest the respondents were.
Compounding
this problem is the fact that Anda and Felitti, in their initial
papers, were
unable to come up with a solid explanation for why adverse childhood
experiences produced serious health problems in adulthood. If you go to
the
main C.D.C. Web page dedicated to the ACE study, you'll see a schematic
diagram
that traces a path from adverse childhood experiences through "social,
emotional, and cognitive impairment" and "adoption of health-risk
behaviors" to disease, disability, and early death. But beside this
diagram, linking the causes to the effects, are big blue arrows labeled
"Scientific Gaps."
Despite this
uncertainty, Felitti has written that the ACE data "have given us
reason
to reconsider the very structure of primary care medical practice in
America." And it's true that, if the data set is accurate, it poses a
significant challenge to the way that we diagnose and treat many
diseases. For
example, the American medical system spends billions of dollars each
year
measuring and trying to lower people's cholesterol, because we know
that having
a cholesterol reading above two hundred and forty milligrams per
deciliter
doubles your chance of heart disease. But, according to the Kaiser
study, so
does having four or more ACEs. So if we trust the data, and we want to
prevent
heart attacks, it makes as much sense to try to reduce ACEs, or counter
their
effects, as it does to try to lower cholesterol.
During the
past decade, other researchers have attempted to address many of the
initial
concerns about the ACE data. One important source of corroboration has
come
from researchers in Dunedin, New Zealand, who, for more than thirty
years, have
been following a group of a thousand people born there between April,
1972, and
March, 1973. According to a recent analysis published in the Archives
of
Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, the incidence of early trauma
among the
Dunedin cohort is similar to that of the Kaiser respondents. The data
in the
Dunedin study, however, are prospective, not retrospective; in other
words, the
adverse experiences were reported by children or parents, or observed
by
researchers, more or less as they happened, rather than recalled by
adult
patients. The Dunedin researchers didn't include some of the most
common
adverse experiences counted by Anda and Felitti, like the alcoholism of
a
family member, but they still found that forty per cent of the children
encountered one or more adverse experiences. And they found similar
correlations between early trauma and later health problems: the
children who
were victims of maltreatment, including maternal neglect and physical
and
sexual abuse, were almost three times as likely to experience major
depression
by their early thirties, and they were almost twice as likely to have
an
elevated risk of heart disease.
Although the
Dunedin study buttressed some of the basic findings of the Kaiser
study, it
didn't fully clarify the mechanisms at work. But, in the years since
the first
ACE paper was published, other researchers, working with rats and
primates as
well as with humans, have made advances in explaining how early trauma
creates
lasting changes in the brain and the body. The key pathway is the
intricately
interconnected system that our brain deploys in reaction to stressful
events.
This system activates defenses on many fronts at once, some of which we
can
recognize as we experience them: it produces emotions like fear and
anxiety, as
well as physical reactions, including increased blood pressure and
heart rate,
clammy skin, and a dry mouth. Other bodily reactions to stress are less
evident: hormones are secreted, neurotransmitters are activated, and
inflammatory proteins surge through the bloodstream.
As a
response to short-term threats, this system is beneficial, even
essential. But
researchers like Bruce McEwen, a neuroendocrinologist at Rockefeller
University, and Frances Champagne, a neuroscientist at Columbia
University,
have shown that repeated, full-scale activation of this stress system,
especially in early childhood, can lead to deep physical changes.
Michael
Meaney, a neurobiologist at McGill University, and his colleagues have
found
that early adversity actually alters the chemistry of DNA in the brain,
through
a process called methylation. Traumatic experiences can cause tiny
chemical
markers called methyl groups to affix themselves to genes that govern
the
production of stress-hormone receptors in the brain. This process
disables
these genes, preventing the brain from properly regulating its response
to
stress. In rat studies, Meaney has found signs that these methylation
patterns
can be reduced by parental nurturing. If the methylation isn't
counteracted,
however, its effects can last a lifetime. Researchers have observed
that
schoolchildren who experience early trauma find it harder to sit still
and to
follow directions. As teenagers, they are more likely to be drawn to
high-risk
behaviors. As adults, they often show increased aggression, impulsive
behavior,
weakened cognition, and an inability to distinguish between real and
imagined
threats.
When it comes
to adult health, the most important element of the stress response is
the
immune system, which, during moments of acute anxiety, releases a
variety of
proteins and other chemical signals into the bloodstream. In the short
term,
this process promotes resistance to infection and prepares the body to
repair
tissues that might be damaged. After the short-term threat disappears,
this
inflammation subsides, unless the system gets overloaded, in which case
these
chemicals can build up, with toxic effects on the heart and other
organs. The
Dunedin researchers found that adults in their thirties who had been
mistreated
as children were nearly twice as likely to have elevated levels of an
inflammatory protein in their blood-high-sensitivity C-reactive
protein-as
adults who had not been mistreated. Many studies have shown
high-sensitivity
C-reactive protein to be a leading marker for cardiovascular disease.
Such
research provided Nadine Burke with a new way to evaluate what she was
seeing
in her clinic, and in Bayview-Hunters Point as a whole. "In many cases,
what looks like a social situation is actually a neurochemical
situation,"
Burke explained one afternoon at the clinic. ''You can trace the
pathology as
it moves from the molecular level to the social level. You have a girl
who
grows up in a household where there s domestic violence, or some kind
of
horrible arguing between her parents. That triggers her fight-or-flight
response, which affects the way the hormone receptors in her brain
develop, and
as she grows up her stress-regulation system goes off track. Maybe she
overreacts to confrontation, or maybe it's the opposite-that she
doesn't
recognize risky situations, and feels comfortable only around a lot of
drama.
So she ends up with a partner who's abusive. Then the pathology moves
from the
individual level to the household level, because that partner beats
their kids,
and then their son goes to a school where ten out of thirty kids are
experiencing the same thing. Those kids create in the classroom a
culture of
hitting, of fighting-not just for the ten kids but for all thirty. Then
those
kids get a little older, and they're teen-agers, and they behave
violently, and
then they beat their kids. And it's just accepted. It becomes a
cultural norm.
It goes from the individual fight-or-flight adrenaline response to a
social
culture where it's, like, 'Oh, black people beat our kids. That's what
we
do.'''
In the
nineteen-sixties, federal policymakers were influenced by scientific
research
that established direct connections between childhood disadvantage and
diminished educational outcomes. Researchers of that period
demonstrated that
disparities in early-childhood experience produced disparities in
cognitive
skill-most significant, in literacy-that could be observed on the first
day of
kindergarten and well into adulthood. Out of that science came a wave
of
early-childhood programs designed to address y those gaps, from Head
Start to
"Sesame y Street." Fifty years later, another generation of
scientific advocates has begun to e make the case for a broader
approach, one
that aims at protecting children from both the mental and the physical
consequences of early adversity.
Jack P.
Shonkoff, a professor of pediatrics at Harvard Medical School, has
emerged as a
leader of this campaign. He headed a group that produced, in 2000,
"From
Neurons to Neighborhoods," a groundbreaking study from the National
Research Council that recommended early intervention for disadvantaged
children. He is now the director of the Center on the Developing Child,
an
interdisciplinary group at Harvard that works with scientists and
legislators
to translate research into policy. Shonkoff cites the ACE study in his
center's
reports, and he respects Anda and Felitti's work, but he calls the
research of
McEwen, Meaney, and others a "revolution in biology." As he said to
me recently, "It's not like we need a strategy for learning and a
strategy
for health and a strategy for character. The beauty of the science is
that it's
showing us how all of these have common roots. We now know that
adversity early
in life can not only disrupt brain circuits that lead to problems with
literacy; it can also affect the development of the cardiovascular
system and
the immune system and metabolic regulatory systems, and lead to not
only more
problems learning in school but also greater risk for diabetes and
hypertension
and heart disease and cancer and depression and substance abuse. This
is a very
exciting opportunity to bring biology into early-childhood policy."
Shonkoff and
Burke are still struggling to figure out how to put this new theory
into
clinical practice. The science does provide powerful evidence that
intervening
early can improve later outcomes in an individual's health--as well as
in his
education and his behavior. And researchers working with rats say they
have
found indications that the physiological effects of stress can be
reversed well
into adolescence, or even adulthood. But there's not yet a lot of good
data to
tell us which kinds of interventions are most effective.
One approach
that scientists have examined is psychopharmacology: fighting chemicals
with
chemicals, by directly targeting the mechanisms in the brain that get
overloaded by early stress. Researchers in Meaney's lab found that they
were able
to counteract stress-related methylation in rat brains with doses of
certain
psychoactive drugs. Though scientists call these findings promising,
they also
express caution. This kind of pharmacological assault on methylation in
the
brain has never been tested in humans, and such a drug regimen would
likely
have many side effects. In the Meaney experiment, furthermore, the
drugs were
injected directly into the rats' brains.
Other
researchers have produced evidence that they can mend children's
overtaxed stress-response
systems by changing the behavior of their parents or caregivers. A
study in
Oregon drew this conclusion after assessing a program that encouraged
foster
parents to be more responsive to the emotional cues of the children in
their
care. Another study, in Delaware, tracked a program that promoted
secure
emotional attachment between children and their foster parents. In each
study,
researchers measured, at various points in the day, the children's
levels of
cortisol, the main stress hormone, and then compared these cortisol
patterns
with those of a control group of foster kids whose parents weren't in
the
program. In both studies, the children whose foster parents received
the
intervention subsequently showed cortisol patterns that echoed those of
children brought up in stable homes.
In terms of
helping older children and adolescents who have experienced early
trauma, the
research is less solid. There is evidence that certain psychological
regimens,
especially cognitive-behavioral therapy, can reduce anxiety and
depression in
patients who are suffering from the stress of early trauma. But, beyond
that,
little is known, which means that, for now, Nadine Burke is trying to
figure
things out on her own.
Every Monday
afternoon at one o'clock, the staff of the Bayview clinic-doctors,
therapists,
social workers-meet in the therapy room for what Burke has named
"multidisciplinary rounds." The meeting is modeled on the kind of
dialogues between specialists that almost never occur in primary-care
facilities
but that do take place in the best cancer centers, where a patient's
oncologist
coordinates care with surgeons and other specialists.
Burke and
her colleagues discuss various patients' ACE scores the way that other
doctors
might talk about blood pressure readings; the ACE score is, for them, a
basic
measure of health and an essential tool in planning treatment. In early
2009,
Burke made a modified version of the Felitti-Anda ACE questionnaire a
standard
part of the annual physical exam for patients. She has now analyzed
data on
more than seven hundred patients, which has allowed her to draw some
preliminary conclusions about the effect of ACEs on the local
population.
It is
difficult to directly compare ACE scores among Burke's patients with
those in
the original Kaiser sample. The Kaiser patients were looking back from
adulthood on their entire childhood; the median age of Burke's patients
is a
little more than seven, and in many cases their ACE scores are just
starting to
add up, and will continue to rise through adolescence. Their current
scores may
also often be artificially reduced by the fact that parents generally
provide
the responses for young children, and they are unlikely to volunteer
that their
children are the victims of, say, emotional neglect. Even so, Burke's
data
reveal some interesting patterns.
Sixty-seven
per cent of her patients have had one or more ACEs, and twelve per cent
have
had four or more. Although it is too early for Burke to study chronic
maladies,
such as obstructive pulmonary disease, in her patients, she has been
able to
demonstrate a strong correlation between ACE scores and problems in
school. In
a paper that Burke and several co-authors will soon publish in
Child-Abuse
& Neglect, they report that just three per cent of her patients
with an ACE
score of 0 display learning or behavioral problems. Among patients with
an ACE
score of 4 or higher, the figure is fifty-one per cent.
At the
Bayview clinic, having the patients' ACE data, and a theoretical
framework for
discussing the effects of trauma, has inspired Burke and her colleagues
to be
more vigilant about abuse and neglect. It also makes them more likely
to help
children get the social services they need, and better prepared to talk
to
parents early about the importance of secure attachment.
For some
children, Burke prescribes one or more psychological therapies. Whitney
Clarke,
the psychologist who introduced Burke to the ACE study, has an office
at the
clinic, and regularly sees about a dozen of Burke's patients. To treat
younger
children growing up in high-risk homes, Burke is collaborating with
Alicia
Lieberman, a leading San Francisco psychologist who is a pioneer of
child-parent psychotherapy, which enables therapists to work
simultaneously
with children under five and their parents. Perhaps not surprisingly
for a
resident of San Francisco, Burke embraces alternative therapies as
well. She
refers a few patients each month to a biofeedback clinic at a hospital
in
Presidio Heights, where the children practice self-calming exercises
while
watching schematic representations of their vital signs on a computer
screen.
She has steered some teen-age patients toward meditation, yoga, and a
relaxation technique called Mind Body Awareness.
The next
step, according to Burke, is to combine these interventions. She has
begun
creating a network of resourceful and like-minded San Franciscans who
want to
expand the ambitions of her clinic. In 2006, Burke met a young local
philanthropist named Daniel Lurie, an heir to the Levi-Strauss fortune;
his
foundation, Tipping Point Community, began contributing to the clinic
before it
had even opened. In the spring of 2008, Burke met Kamala Harris, then
the San
Francisco district attorney (and now the attorney general of
California); Burke
told her about the ACE research, and Harris said that she wanted to
help.
Harris then introduced Burke to Victor G. Carrion - the director of a
research
program on early life stress at the Lucile Packard Children's Hospital,
a
Stanford facility and Katie Albright, the daughter of Madeleine
Albright, the
former Secretary of State, and the executive director of the San
Francisco
Child Abuse Prevention Center. Now Burke, Lurie, Harris, Carrion, and
Albright
are working to open a new center for child services in Bayview-Hunters
Point
that would include a medical clinic, family-support services, a
child-abuse-response program, and an expanded staff of social workers
and
psychotherapists, as well as space for biofeedback and other stress
reduction
therapies. Soon after meeting Burke, Harris helped direct two million
dollars
in city funds toward the new center. Last May, Tipping Point Community
raised
four million dollars for the center in a single evening. Lurie and
Burke say
that the new center is on track to open next year.
Burke's goal
is a treatment protocol, like the one doctors use when they're dealing
with
cancer or diabetes. "For cancer patients, someone comes in, they have
stage-four breast cancer, they're BRCA -negative, they have these
different
types of comorbid factors," she explained one day last fall. "As a
doctor, you can look up that combination of indicators, and you know
what to
do. I would love to see a treatment protocol that says, you know, this
child
comes in, she's six years old. She has a history of intrauterine drug
exposure
and domestic violence." Burke ticked her way down an imaginary medical
chart. "She is here today following removal from the home and
foster-care
placement after six years of physical and emotional abuse by dad and
neglect by
mom. And she's manifesting A, B, and C symptoms. And you
could say,
'O.K., let's start with twelve weeks of biofeedback, overlaid with a
one-year
course of insight-oriented therapy, and go from there.' " One patient
might need to be removed from an abusive home; another might benefit
from a
course of antidepressants or a better diet. Burke acknowledges that it
will
take a lot of work to get her field to the level of practical coherence
where,
say, oncology is today. But she also contends that the only way to even
approach that goal is to begin testing different combinations of
therapies in a
clinical setting.
For many of
Burke's patients, especially the older ones, it's going to be very
difficult to
reverse the effects of years of adversity.
In many
ways, Monisha Sullivan has flourished under the care of the Bayview
clinic. Her
asthma is under control, and she has
finally had a full set of immunizations. In 2009, she was assigned to
yet
another foster home, in Oakland, and she
and her new foster mother, a grandmotherly type named Ethel Holmes,
found a way
to coexist without door lamming fights. Sullivan started therapy with
Whitney
Clarke, and had so much to tell him each week that she asked if they
could
schedule sessions lasting ninety minutes, instead of the usual fifty.
She
worked hard to develop a stable relationship with her father, and her
connection with her daughter grew tighter. 'When I first had Sarai, I
didn't
hate her, but I didn't love her," she told me last September. "But I
really
love her now." Last spring, she graduated from high school, and she
started college in the fall, taking classes in theatre and video
production at
a San Francisco art school.
Yet, last
fall, as I visited Sullivan every month or so, it seemed that each time
we
spoke there was a new setback. School was a challenge. There was never
enough
money. She was assaulted, she said, by an ex-boyfriend she had invited
over one
night, to stave off loneliness. Then the city told her that she had to
move out
of her sunny apartment off Fillmore Street to a small, dark place back
in
Hunters Point.
When
Sullivan started school, Holmes offered to keep Sarai with her in
Oakland
during the week, so that Sullivan could focus on her studies. Sullivan
was
grateful, but it made her feel guilty and inadequate, and she wondered
if she
would ever be ready to take care of Sarai on her own. ''I'm trying to
be
everything my parents weren't," she told me. "And it's not
working." She was determined to improve her life-her cell-phone
ringtone
is the Miley Cyrus song "The Climb," an inspirational ballad about
overcoming obstacles-but her anxiety had not diminished. "Sometimes the
stress is just too much for me to bear," she said one day. "I don't
see how people deal with it."
Burke is realistic
about the challenges that Sullivan and other patients face, and there
are
plenty of days, she says, when their problems feel overwhelming, even
for her.
Nevertheless, she is convinced that her new methodology will give
patients a
better chance at good health and a good future. "Look, it's not the
answer
for a hundred per cent of everyone's social problems," she told me.
"It's not that if we poured all of our money into treating ACEs the
jails
would empty out and we would no longer have any kids in special ed. But
this is
a huge, huge issue, and as a society I don't think we've even come
close to
grasping its significance." +
THE NEW
YORKER MARCH 21, 2011