|
The nineteen
years of Aung San Suu Kyi's detention cannot be measured in terms of
political gains. Rather, her brave stand should be seen as a beacon of
morality in a world better known for corruption and pusillanimity; and
as a reminder of the crucial importance of democracy. As Vaclav Havel
said, when nominating her for the Nobel Peace Prize, she is an
"outstanding example of the power of the powerless".
Con tin tuyệt
hảo: Quyền Lực của Không Quyền Lực. Cuộc đời Aung San Suu Kyi
TLS July 13
2007
Cuộc giam giữ
kéo dài 19 năm của bà không thể tính bằng những lợi lộc chính trị. Đúng
hơn, dáng đứng can trường của bà phải được coi như là ngọn hải đăng đạo
đức, trong một thế giới hư ruỗng, và càng làm cho chúng ta thấy, tự do
dân chủ cần thiết, và quí giá biết là chừng nào. Như Vaclav Havel đã
từng nói, khi tiến cử bà vào danh sách những người xứng đáng Nobel Hòa
Bình, đây là một thí dụ hiển hách của "quyền lực không quyền lực".
Power of the
powerless
CAROLINE
MOOREHEAD
Justin Wintle
PERFECT
HOSTAGE
A Life of
Aung San
Suu Kyi
336pp. Hutchinson.
£18.99.
9780091796518
On
July 20, 1989, Aung San Suu Kyi, the forty-three-year-old
wife of an Oxford academic,
was placed under house arrest in her family home
in Rangoon.
And
there, apart from a brief spell in prison, and short periods of partial
freedom, she has remained, cut off from the outside world, a constant
reminder
and potent symbol of Burma's
enduringly repressive regime. Repeatedly offered her freedom in return
for
permanent exile, she has simply refused.
It is not easy to
write a conventional biography of a figure both so public and so private, whose fame resides less in action than
in what she stands for. For Perfect Hostage, his Life of Aung San Suu
Kyi, Justin Wintle was unable
even to contact his subject; indeed, he has no idea whether or not she
knows that
he has written this book. Inevitably, the result is less a Life than a
history, in which
the story of Aung San Suu Kyi and her remarkable father, Aung San,
architect of Burma's
independence, runs like a thread through a dense and detailed narrative.
Aung San Suu Kyi
barely knew her father. Aung San, a left-leaning pragmatist for whom
the need
to free Burma
from imperial rule was more important than any political creed, led Burma's
independence movement through confrontations with the British and the
wartime Japanese occupiers, but did not live to see the
results of his achievements. Six months before formal Burmese
independence in 1948, he
was assassinated by his political rival, U Saw (who was later tried and
executed).
Aung San Suu Kyi, then three years old, grew up as the only daughter of
a man revered
throughout a country riven by political infighting and ethnic
divisions. Her mother, a
former nurse, was made ambassador to India,
and Aung San Suu Kyi accompanied her to Delhi,
before going to university in England
and taking a job with the United Nations in New York. Her much loved younger
brother was
drowned as a child; relations with her older brother were never good.
In 1972,
she married Michael Aris, an academic specializing in Asian history, by
whom
she had two sons. She stayed away from Burma.
In 1962, a coup led
by General Ne Win had brought to an end the squabbles crippling Burma.
In their place had come total military repression. When, in 1988, Aung
San Suu Kyi returned to Rangoon
to nurse her dying mother, she found the country in the grip of police
and army brutality, torture, corruption and
censorship. Following the resignation of Ne Win, a popular uprising
calling for democratization
was savagely put down on August 8. Protesters were rounded up and
disappeared into
detention, some never to remerge. Later, it was said that 10,000 people
had been
killed by the security forces of the new military junta. It was perhaps
inevitable that the
survivors, especially among her father's former comrades and among
students, would now look
to Aung San's daughter for leadership. The rambling old family house in
University
Avenue
in Rangoon became
the centre of a growing opposition to the military
dictatorship, calling for dialogue and democracy. Faced with what soon seemed inevitable arrest, Aung San Suu Kyi
merely
grew bolder. She took to addressing rallies; finally, the military
acted. Her
house was cleared of her friends and supporters, the telephone was cut
off and
she was forbidden to leave the compound. Henceforth only her sons and
her
husband, very occasionally, would be allowed inside. Early in 1990,
longawaited
elections finally took place. Aung San Suu Kyi's political grouping,
the National
League for Democracy, scored an overwhelming victory. But the generals
and the
State Law and Order Restoration Council remained in power; and Aung San
Suu Kyi
remained in detention, her only contact with the outside world a small
short-wave radio.
The story of her
last nineteen years is quickly told. Freed after 2,191 days, she was
soon rearrested; freed nineteen months later, she was locked
up again. She had used her moments of freedom to preach democracy,
forcefully and to as
many people as she could reach. Cut off from the world, she became,
like Nelson
Mandela on Robben
Island,
an increasingly famous figure. Award followed award; in 1991,
she was given the Nobel Peace Prize. The cost of her isolation has,
however, been
extremely high. She has seen
neither of her sons grow up, and for most of the time she
has been alone, except for the presence of an elderly maid. Visits from
her children and
her husband have been short and infrequent. When, in 1997, Michael Aris
was diagnosed
with incurable cancer, he was refused a visa to Burma
to see his wife; together, they agreed that she would not come to England to see him, since that would
mean no
return to Burma.
Aris died two years later without seeing her again. From time to time,
over the
past eighteen years, photographs of Aung San Suu Kyi have appeared:
elegant, frail,
staunch, with the flowers in her hair that have become part of her
image. She
is known to have been ill and to sustain herself on the Buddhist faith,
leamt
from her mother, that taught her selflessness and discipline. All this
material
is largely in the public domain; family friends and colleagues, if
approached, have
contributed little to make her come to life.
Not until the very
end of his long and scholarly book does Wintle address the question of
what
Aung San Suu Kyi's lonely stand has achieved. Burma
and its repressive rulers are
widely known today, he suggests, largely because of her tenacity and
courage.
But, he points out, their dictatorial ways have not been curbed.
Isolated from the West, pariahs in human rights terms, they have
survived economically by
selling off their rich reserves of teak, oil, gas and gems, by their
close
links to China, and by their flourishing narcotics industry; in the
process,
driving dissidents over the borders into refugee camps in Thailand, and
enslaving thousands of Karens, Karennis, Mons and other ethnic
minorities to use
as child soldiers and labourers to build roads and to work in mines.
Even tourism,
which has been condemned by Aung San Suu Kyi, is now picking up pace.
But all this is, as
Justin Wintle himself recognizes, beside the point. The nineteen years
of Aung San Suu Kyi's detention cannot be measured in
terms of political gains. Rather, her brave stand should be seen as a
beacon of
morality in a world better known for corruption and pusillanimity; and
as a reminder of the
crucial importance of democracy. As Vaclav Havel said, when nominating
her for
the Nobel Peace Prize, she is an "outstanding example of the power of
the
powerless". If Perfect Hostage tells you disappointingly little about
Aung
San Suu Kyi's real character or personal life, it provides a remarkable
picture
of what one individual can come to
symbolize, given courage and endurance.
|