*



           

*

INTRODUCTION

by LAWRENCE DURRELL

It would be invidious to make extravagant claims for the genius of an author the greater part of whose best work is not available to his countrymen. This task were better left to the critics of a future age who will be able to discuss it with the impartiality it deserves. But one thing is certain: both America and England will one day be forced to come to terms with him on his own ground. Yet perhaps when this time comes-when he can be studied in the light of his intentions-even the moralists of letters (it is too much to hope that our puritan cultures will ever cease to bring forth moralists) may discover that, in an inverted sort of way, Miller is really on the side of the angels; and that his work, regarded in its totality (as he wishes it to be) is simply one of the great liberating confessions of our age, and offers its readers the chance of being purged "by pity and by terror" in

the Aristotelian way. It offers catharsis ....

But my job would be best done if I could succeed in situating him in the literature of our time-for he does not fit easily into any of the text-book categories. Indeed he is rather a visionary, than merely a writer. I suspect that his final place will be among those towering anomalies of authorship like Whitman or Blake who have left us, not simply works of art, but a corpus of ideas which motivate and influence a whole cultural pattern.

Miller has elected to shame the devil and tell the truth, and his work is one of the bravest, richest and most consistent ventures in this domain since Jean- Jacques Rousseau. By its very nature such a task must transgress the narrow limits of what ordinary people regard as permissible; canons of taste, conventional ideas of beauty and propriety, they must be renovated in the light of his central objective-the search for truth. Often the result is shocking, terrifying; but then truth has always been a fierce oracle rather than a bleat or a whimper. But no one, I think, could read (as I have just done) through the whole length and breadth of his work without wonder and amazement-and finally without gratitude for what he has undertaken on behalf of us all. It isn't pretty, a lot of it, but then neither is real life.

It goes right to the bone. It is absolutely veridic and unflinching in its intellectual bravery. It is significant, too, to mention that among the first few great men of the day to acknowledge Miller's greatness was a philosopher, Count Keyserling. I still remember the expression of amazed delight on the face of the author of Tropic of Cancer when he unfolded the telegram and read the message: "I salute a great free spirit." To grasp the intention is everything. "I am against pornography and for obscenity," writes Miller; and again in another place:

"My books are not about sex but about self-liberation"; and yet again: "The full and joyful acceptance of the worst in oneself is the only sure way of transforming it." These statements deserve the reader's fullest attention.

But even if Miller were not the personage he happens to be his tremendous prose-gift would have carried him easily into the forefront of contemporary writing. This anthology has been designed to show him in his various moods and styles, and to illustrate his thinking; for while the whole work constitutes "a single, endless autobiography," he is a protean craftsman and handles every vein, from the short story to the essay, with equal ease and delight. I have tried to select the best examples from each field; I have also tried to follow him synoptically from the Bowery to Paris, from Paris to Greece, and then back to America where he now lives, reconciled (to judge by his latest book) to the native country which he has criticized so harshly, and of whose literature he is the jewel and nonpareil. Yes, the rogue elephant of American literature has found a quiet home at last in California where he waits patiently for the time when his work will receive the official clemency it deserves. Meanwhile the French and the Japanese reader (he is a best-seller in both countries) keep him alive and able to concentrate on Nexus which is to be his last book. 

At peace with his neighbor, reconciled to friend and foe alike, and secure in the knowledge of his fame, he awaits the verdict of the young Americans of the future-not just the writers, but the ordinary folk as well, artisans, laborers and carpenters who buy their fifteen thousand copies of Whitman every year .... What will they make of this great tortured confession which spans the whole range between marvelous comedy and grim tragedy? It is exciting to imagine. I am not gifted with second sight unfortunately but I imagine that they will realize that Miller has been honest on behalf of us all, so to speak, and that everything which he describes as true of himself is true of every man jack of us, particularly what is self-indulgent, perverse or even downright horrible; particularly what is silly no less than noble or grand. What he has tried to do is to accept and so transform the warring elements in the secret life of man, and his work is a record of the battle at every stage. That is really the central message of Miller. Great vagabond of literature that he is, he will not want for readers among our grandchildren.

Lawrence Durrell

 *